The Basic Principles Of separate corporate identity pakistan case law
The Basic Principles Of separate corporate identity pakistan case law
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The main objectives of police will be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and over all make certain regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents on the boy or Female do not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they're able to do if they can cut off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by regulation.
The ruling of your first court created case law that must be accompanied by other courts till or Except either new regulation is created, or possibly a higher court rules differently.
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
As being the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in a few context, it really is actually really vague about whether the ninety-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based on the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held into the 90-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons possessing their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature of your petitioner. Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a nicely-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to complete away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety times to the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided because of the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe for a foster child. Even though the pair experienced two younger children of their possess at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had young children.
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, Additionally it is a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, check here and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.